REFLECTOR: Making Velocities easier to build?

[Andy Millin]

I'm not sure the current builder community is the target.  There are some
for sure.

 

The factory was looking at making a pre-molded, ready to install set of
strakes.  They would have integral fuel tanks and would be molded to shape.
Slip the back end on the spar, set the length and incidence and bond them
on.  I believe they had other ideas that would allow them to compete with
the 2 weeks to taxi options offered by other kit manufacturers.

 

The new options might make Velocity an option for those that have the money
(bags and bags), want the plane, and don't really want to build.

 

I wanted to build my plane.  I didn't buy any fast build options.  I would
not be the target audience.

 

Andy

 

From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of Reiff Lorenz
Sent: 10-02-2009 3:55
To: reflector at tvbf.org
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Making Velocities easier to build?

 

 

My original thread got hijacked by the where's-the-part-I-ordered concerns.

 

Back to the topic: How many Velocity builders (current or future) would be
willing to pay more for parts that take a lot less time to finish and
install? The original quote implied that it would cost Velocity HQ around
$200k to develop the tooling and procedures to offer an extra-fast-build kit
or an accelerated builders-assistance program. Is it worth the time and
expense for them to do this?

 

Scott, Thanks for the info on the FAA standardizing their regulations
between offices. It sounds like some west-coast kitplane manufacturers have
been able to offer their customers more help than the Florida companies. 

 

Reiff Lorenz

 

 

 

From: Reiff Lorenz 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:12 PM
To: 'reflector at tvbf.org'
Subject: Making Velocities easier to build?

 

 

I downloaded the November issue of Kitplanes an came across this quote by
the CEO of Velocity on page 33. It was in response to the question: How has
the homebuilt aircraft industry changed over the last 25 years?

 

====================

The FAA has allowed . . . 

a builder can come to the factory

and pay for professional assistance

from factory-trained staff. . . .

 

It will be a benefit to any manufacturers

that can afford to set up this kind of

builders assistance program. We estimate

for Velocity it will cost upwards of

$200,000 to set up the program. . . 

go back and modify every

mold that we have so that no longer does

the builder have to do something with

those parts. . . .

the labor for the builder decreases.

It will be more expensive, but someone

who can afford [it] . . . 

will see this as an attractive program.

 

Velocity CEO Duane Swing

 

=================== 

 

He seems to be talking about changes ahead for the Velocity builder who
wants to assemble an aircraft but not fabricate as many components. Anybody
heard of the program that he mentions setting up? This seems to run contrary
to what the FAA has been saying in their recent review of the 51% rule. I'd
love to hear all your opinions.

 

Reiff Lorenz

Velocity builder wanna-be

(hoping to hit the lottery for  $300,000)

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20091002/ab48ced3/attachment-0001.htm>