REFLECTOR: Bad running Franklin
Scott Derrick
scott at tnstaafl.net
Mon May 4 10:04:11 CDT 2009
Thats amazing you figured that out! WHo would have suspected a miss
marked crank or cam, from the factory no less!
Scott
Jerry Teitsma wrote:
> Several of you have helped me search for a solution difficulties in
> getting my Franklin engine running properly. As a brief recap, I
> bought the PZL Franklin new about 5 years ago and flew it for about 26
> hours. It never ran well which I attributed at least partially due to
> plug fouling. The rings never seated properly. I finally decided to
> re-sleeve the cylinders to get a softer grade of steel as liners. I
> sent the cylinders to Davis Aviation for new sleeves. I fly out of an
> elevation of 8200 ft and it is difficult to get manifold pressure.
>
> After reassembly of the engine and re-installation, the engine ran
> worse than ever - back firing and popping and difficulty getting RPMs
> above 1500. I checked everything - induction leaks, carburetor
> function, mags, wiring, plugs - you name it - nothing helped. I tried
> to locate centerline intake valve angle but had difficulty locating
> these number. Eventually, Phil Davis of Davis Aviation located these
> numbers and sent them to me.
>
> Saturday, mechanic John Welty and I used these numbers to check the
> center line angle for the intake valve on #1 cylinder and found the
> angle to be off 6 degrees. Instead of 104 degrees, the angle was 98
> degrees. So, the engine was pulled once again. We took off the mags
> and accessories at the back of the engine and took off the rear
> cover. Then, we pulled the starter ring, revealing the cam gear and
> crank gear.
> When rotated, the mark on the crank gear meshed between the two marks
> on the cam gear (or the other way around) just like the book said it
> should but the center line angle was wrong. We pulled the crank and
> cam gears and reset them so that the angle was correct. We had to
> move the gear one tooth - about 6 degrees.
>
> After reassembly and reinstallation, we started the engine and it now
> appears to be running well. I have not yet flown it but intend to do
> so this week. It has been a frustrating - and expensive - several
> months trying to get this resolved.
>
> I'm not sure why this happened but have a guess. It appears that the
> cam gear or crank gear was miss-marked. When the engine was test run
> at the factory, it likely did not run at all well. It appears that
> they opened the valve lash enough to run. When we reset the valve
> lash to the proper amount, the engine would not run. Now that the cam
> timing is correct, it runs with the proper valve lash. Sounds
> incredible but I can't think of any thing else.
>
> If anyone needs or wants a copy of the valve lift versus angle, please
> contact me and I will e-mail the table to you. Thanks to each of you
> for your suggestions and help.
>
> Jerry Teitsma
> Granby CO
> 970-887-3910 (Phone/Fax)
> jerryteits at comcast.net <mailto:jerryteits at comcast.net>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20090504/0ac9e3cb/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Reflector
mailing list